"Ushahidi, which means ”testimony” in Swahili, is a website that was developed to map reports of violence in Kenya after the post-election fallout at the beginning of 2008. They are working to build a new platform that can be used anywhere in the world, and this blog tells some of that story" (http://blog.ushahidi.com/)
jueves, 20 de mayo de 2010
THE BOB'S
My favourite blog was The Ushahidi Blog.
"Ushahidi, which means ”testimony” in Swahili, is a website that was developed to map reports of violence in Kenya after the post-election fallout at the beginning of 2008. They are working to build a new platform that can be used anywhere in the world, and this blog tells some of that story" (http://blog.ushahidi.com/)
This blog has become a great tool and source of imformation for understanding many of the different dynamics that happen in that country. It also appears as very good expample or alternative to be followed by other countries like Colombia where voilence is used as an excuse to justify ideological struggle and demagogic speeches. This blog allows people to tell and to know the truth of what really happens and permit a transparent view of the problem, making smokescreens everytime more difficult to be made for those interested in the conflict to be kept.
"Ushahidi, which means ”testimony” in Swahili, is a website that was developed to map reports of violence in Kenya after the post-election fallout at the beginning of 2008. They are working to build a new platform that can be used anywhere in the world, and this blog tells some of that story" (http://blog.ushahidi.com/)
Quala, the best Colombian company and No 10 in Latin america.
These are the behaviors that, according to them, characterize their people and that will ensure they achieve compliance with the objectives of the organization:
1. Transparency and integrity: It works continuously in accordance with their beliefs and values that are consistent with those of the Organization, even in difficult situations, build confidence and credibility both internally and externally.
3.Clarity of purpose: Means the totality of a situation clearly and accurately set goals, visualize the impact of events and how they affect the results. Go clear and targeted way to do what is required and acts in accordance with these definitions.
4. Problem analysis: Proactively identifies all the events, issues and opportunities for improvement, with a critical permanent, establishing the key factors, considering and linking various variables.
5. Innovative and creative solution of problems: Address the problems posed by alternative actions applicable, comprehensive and original that add value to work and create new opportunities.
6. Listen, adaptability and flexibility: Listen, values and seeks proactive and genuine questions and points of view, interpreting the purpose of generating the best alternative. Adapts its own approach and way of operate as the situation demands.
7. Organization and monitoring:Make your work a serial made in the activities and routine monitoring with random checking to ensure the collection of results efficiently.
8. Results-orientation: It works by continuously following meet and exceed the expected results, identifying and implementing the necessary actions and overcoming adversity.
9. Continuous improvement: Actively learns from own mistakes and successes of others and the environment on a continual basis, capitalizing on the experience for new shareholders being enriched root finding solutions and leading new proposals that would lead to continuous improvement personnel, area and of the Organization.
10. Optimal management of resources: Has the approach that lets you optimize the cost benefit, making effective management, rational and responsible use of resources, achieving permanent full advantage of them.
11. Teamwork: Work with common goals, has clearly and assumes its responsibility in achieving the objectives, coordinating its activities with other members and putting the interests of the personal computer.
12. Influence others: Linked and achieves the maximum commitment and contribution of others on which there is not necessarily formal authority to obtain a common goal.
13. Leading and developing others: Inspires others to achieve high performance levels, defines and achieves the commitment to outcomes, evaluate objectively, provides feedback and recognition, nurturing a competent workforce productive, motivated and in constant development.
14. Expertise: It has the technical mastery of the issues under its responsibility and provides advice to its partners / customers and partners require
They sostain that their succes is based on:
- A deep knowledge of popular local consumers and the opportunities in the channels in which supply and the various cases, transactions, ideas, concepts and executions of local and international market.
- The identification, attraction, retention and development of human talent SUPERIOR, honest and committed.
- A culture focused on innovation with clarity of purpose, which is achieved with the best ideas, excellence in execution and with the minds and hearts of all our people in the game.
- The continuous search for high returns.
BLOGS ACTIVITY
The blogs I decided to comment were really nice. They were all quite interesting. I visited:
My favourite was the Ximena's comment about women's dowry. As I commented, it is really shocking that these barbarian acts be commited against women. What other terrible things can we expect from these people?
My favourite was the Ximena's comment about women's dowry. As I commented, it is really shocking that these barbarian acts be commited against women. What other terrible things can we expect from these people?
jueves, 13 de mayo de 2010
The working time problem..
According to an important report from the Federation of European Employees, almost all collective agreements set basic weekly working hours for full-time staff at between 35 hours and 40 hours a week, whilst in many countries such as Spain and Sweden there are statutory limits of 40 hours for normal weekly working time. White collar workers across Europe continue to work less hours than blue collar workers, although this gap is narrowing over time. Every EU country permits certain levels of overtime to be worked in addition to regular hours, but not all recognise the 48 hours per week maximum limit established by the EC Working Time Directive.
Data from the EU Labour Force Survey for Q4 2007 appears at first glance to confirm this general pattern, but closer investigation suggests that the reality may be quite different for many employees.
The report sostains that the governments of many EU member states have further enhanced these entitlements and created additional rights such as paternity leave, sabbaticals, sick leave arrangements and leave to care for dependants. Legally enforceable collective agreements have also gone beyond basic statutory rights to introduce even more opportunities to take time off work, and double holiday pay received by workers in some countries makes it more financially rewarding to be on annual leave than at work.
These changes, introduced for the benefit of employees, have had an effect quite contrary to that intended. Although additional time-off rights might be seen as an opportunity to generate extra jobs, the fragmented nature of absence due to such factors as sickness, emergency childcare or attendance at ante-natal clinics has meant that the cover required varies from day to day.
It also argues that, the split in social philosophies at the heart of Europe between libertarian 'American-style' values pursued by the UK, Ireland and many new EU states and the more welfare-orientated 'social model' maintained by many continental western European states such as France, Sweden and the Netherlands has recently come to a head over the issue of the UK's continued opt-out from the maximum working week.
The report finally conludes that the real problem about working time, however, is not the imposition of statutory upper limits, but a social framework that makes it impossible for companies to operate efficiently within these limits. Rather than preventing those who wish to work longer hours from improving their income levels, the focus for EU policymakers should be on increasing the proportion of the employed workforce that are available to carry out their jobs. This means taking a long hard look at how much employee benefits are creating a 'time off' culture and providing financial incentives to spend too much time absent from work.
Data from the EU Labour Force Survey for Q4 2007 appears at first glance to confirm this general pattern, but closer investigation suggests that the reality may be quite different for many employees.
The report sostains that the governments of many EU member states have further enhanced these entitlements and created additional rights such as paternity leave, sabbaticals, sick leave arrangements and leave to care for dependants. Legally enforceable collective agreements have also gone beyond basic statutory rights to introduce even more opportunities to take time off work, and double holiday pay received by workers in some countries makes it more financially rewarding to be on annual leave than at work.
These changes, introduced for the benefit of employees, have had an effect quite contrary to that intended. Although additional time-off rights might be seen as an opportunity to generate extra jobs, the fragmented nature of absence due to such factors as sickness, emergency childcare or attendance at ante-natal clinics has meant that the cover required varies from day to day.
It also argues that, the split in social philosophies at the heart of Europe between libertarian 'American-style' values pursued by the UK, Ireland and many new EU states and the more welfare-orientated 'social model' maintained by many continental western European states such as France, Sweden and the Netherlands has recently come to a head over the issue of the UK's continued opt-out from the maximum working week.
The report finally conludes that the real problem about working time, however, is not the imposition of statutory upper limits, but a social framework that makes it impossible for companies to operate efficiently within these limits. Rather than preventing those who wish to work longer hours from improving their income levels, the focus for EU policymakers should be on increasing the proportion of the employed workforce that are available to carry out their jobs. This means taking a long hard look at how much employee benefits are creating a 'time off' culture and providing financial incentives to spend too much time absent from work.
It is not enough to say "sorry"
I found a quite interesting paper from a multicultural journal, where the Australian case is highlighted and showed as an example of “reconciliation” without and an inclusive political community.
Here is a small fragment of this interesting article:
The ‘national reconciliation’ project is a political technique designed to bring about an end to violence thereby promoting peace within fractured national societies. It seeks to overcome a violent past by not repeating it.
More recently, reconciliation and human rights discourse has been applied to international humanitarian intervention in states in crisis and in the ‘new wars’. In both cases the focus on the victims of violence is a therapeutic strategy by the state designed to help recover sovereignty and legitimacy through recognition and care. The therapeutic focus on individual well-being and healing through victim-centred truth politics or conflict prevention through behavioural and attitudinal change however, is no substitute for the reconstruction of an inclusive political community.
This paper also explores the limits of conventional legal understandings of responsibility as a means of dealing with the legacies of colonisation of Australia. It suggests that the overriding focus upon ‘moral agency’ in contemporary legal and historical debates may actually restrict or derail the institution of reconciliation as a tool of justice. The author suggests that the tragic tradition can enrich or extend our understanding of the reconciliation process, firstly by sponsoring a concept of responsibility that does not take its bearings from the purposes or intentions of the agent and, secondly, by establishing a connection between our spectatorship on the events of the past and the education of compassion.
He also sostains that although there are many competing conceptions of reconciliation, its deployment in former colonial societies might best be understood in terms of the process of ‘coming to terms’ or ‘dealing’ with the past. In this context, the concept of ‘dealing’ carries two related, but analytically distinguishable, meanings: that of exposing or recalling the (always painful) truth about the past and that of resolving or repairing the ruptures of the past. While these moments of memory and healing are readily transposed into a psychoanalytic register as aspects of the ‘work of mourning’ (a concept which I will return to later), they are more commonly framed within politico juridical discourse as matters of historical injustice. From this perspective, what is primarily at stake in our ‘dealings’ with the past is the remembrance of forgotten or undisclosed crimes and their expiation by the perpetrating community or their descendants.
Concluding, according to him, this framing of the discourse of reconciliation gives rise to two nests of questions:
In the first place, there are the complex series of issues that are intrinsic to the notion of historical obligation itself: how are these obligations incurred, how far back in time do they stretch, how might they be redeemed?
Secondly, there is the philosophically intricate matter of how reparations for past wrongs, whether in the form of restitution or compensation, might be articulated with other retributive and distributive claims in a more general theory of justice.
Here is a small fragment of this interesting article:
The ‘national reconciliation’ project is a political technique designed to bring about an end to violence thereby promoting peace within fractured national societies. It seeks to overcome a violent past by not repeating it.
More recently, reconciliation and human rights discourse has been applied to international humanitarian intervention in states in crisis and in the ‘new wars’. In both cases the focus on the victims of violence is a therapeutic strategy by the state designed to help recover sovereignty and legitimacy through recognition and care. The therapeutic focus on individual well-being and healing through victim-centred truth politics or conflict prevention through behavioural and attitudinal change however, is no substitute for the reconstruction of an inclusive political community.
This paper also explores the limits of conventional legal understandings of responsibility as a means of dealing with the legacies of colonisation of Australia. It suggests that the overriding focus upon ‘moral agency’ in contemporary legal and historical debates may actually restrict or derail the institution of reconciliation as a tool of justice. The author suggests that the tragic tradition can enrich or extend our understanding of the reconciliation process, firstly by sponsoring a concept of responsibility that does not take its bearings from the purposes or intentions of the agent and, secondly, by establishing a connection between our spectatorship on the events of the past and the education of compassion.
He also sostains that although there are many competing conceptions of reconciliation, its deployment in former colonial societies might best be understood in terms of the process of ‘coming to terms’ or ‘dealing’ with the past. In this context, the concept of ‘dealing’ carries two related, but analytically distinguishable, meanings: that of exposing or recalling the (always painful) truth about the past and that of resolving or repairing the ruptures of the past. While these moments of memory and healing are readily transposed into a psychoanalytic register as aspects of the ‘work of mourning’ (a concept which I will return to later), they are more commonly framed within politico juridical discourse as matters of historical injustice. From this perspective, what is primarily at stake in our ‘dealings’ with the past is the remembrance of forgotten or undisclosed crimes and their expiation by the perpetrating community or their descendants.
Concluding, according to him, this framing of the discourse of reconciliation gives rise to two nests of questions:
In the first place, there are the complex series of issues that are intrinsic to the notion of historical obligation itself: how are these obligations incurred, how far back in time do they stretch, how might they be redeemed?
Secondly, there is the philosophically intricate matter of how reparations for past wrongs, whether in the form of restitution or compensation, might be articulated with other retributive and distributive claims in a more general theory of justice.
Reference:
Muldoon, P. (2005). Thinking Responsibility Differently: Reconciliation and the Tragedy of Colonisation. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 26(3), 237-254. doi:10.1080/07256860500153518
.
lunes, 3 de mayo de 2010
In the Islam, values are immersed in commerce, even if it is electronic.
Something to highlight from islamic culture is the fact that they live their religion in all the aspects of their lives. They do not separate their believes from their daily activities, as many chrsitian and catholic, western do, which preach peace, justice, honesty and mainly LOVE but contradictorily, their behavior is based on another set of values such as competitiveness, law of the fittest, rethoric (persuasion and disuasion instead of tolerance and respect) and mainly SELFISHNESS. At this point god would be on another level, he/she/it is not immerse in peoples lives and his/her/its role is more of a punisher than a guide.
For me, the islamic way of living has an completely sense and that’s why I think if we westerns lived our lives according to our religions, our companies and way of living and doing business would be really different and there would not be so many unlucky people.
Muslims do not separate their religion and its values from their commercial relations, not even if it they are electronic, and that is why they ask for so many exlpicit especifications and warnings in these ways of doing business, commercializing and negotiating, not even if they are bargaining. On the contrary, we, westerns are all the time thinking about that the other should thing like us and have the same expectations and wishes when doing a business and some things like false adevertisements and misrepresenations are not seen as terrible as muslims see them.
For me, the islamic way of living has an completely sense and that’s why I think if we westerns lived our lives according to our religions, our companies and way of living and doing business would be really different and there would not be so many unlucky people.
Muslims do not separate their religion and its values from their commercial relations, not even if it they are electronic, and that is why they ask for so many exlpicit especifications and warnings in these ways of doing business, commercializing and negotiating, not even if they are bargaining. On the contrary, we, westerns are all the time thinking about that the other should thing like us and have the same expectations and wishes when doing a business and some things like false adevertisements and misrepresenations are not seen as terrible as muslims see them.
jueves, 25 de marzo de 2010
INDIA THE NEW GURU
I would like to publish a summary I made about a wonderful article I found in a EBSCOhost Database taken from the Harvard business review. I think is really interesting because it shows many Indian advantages in terms of economical issues. It also appears as a more prosper country than China since it has better labor policies and it has been really worried about improving them.
Yet India is racing ahead to become a global center for advanced R&D in several industries. In trying to understand how India is achieving this feat, we know that the Indian private sector was found a way to overcome deficiencies in its education system through innovative programs of workforce training and development. These have transformed workers with a weak educational foundation into R&D specialists.
Indian native firms reveal that despite its low rates of postgraduate science and engineering graduation comparing to China, India is rapidly becoming a global hub for R&D, with a momentum and scale similar to those it accomplished in IT services.
But If engineering education is so critical to global competitiveness, how is India succeeding?
To answer this, we have to take into account the R&D leaders, managers, and employees, and see the R&D and training facilities the leading companies in India. These are in rapidly growing emerging sectors, including TT services, business-process outsourcing, semiconductors, Pharmaceuticals, financial services, retail, hospitality; and education—all of which have managed to grow and innovate despite skills gaps and talent shortages.
The Indian key of development: Discipline
During the 70s and 1980s, the Japanese achieved major advances in manufacturing management, which led them rise as an economic power by studying, adopting, and eventually perfecting the best practices of western companies. India is achieving similar feats in workforce development: India has learned and perfected the best practices of leading companies that have been outsourcing their computer systems and call centers.
They invest in their employees
In a fact which India’s largest competitor, China, has been quite criticized is investing in its employees. Indian industry has had to adapt and has built innovative and comprehensive approaches to workforce training and management. The initial focus was on training new recruits and filling entirely-level skill gaps. Now, these companies are investing in constantly improving the skills and management abilities of their workers and in providing incentives for them to stay and grow with the company.
There are seven key areas in which Indian companies have developed innovative practices:
1) employee recruitment
2) new employee training
3) continuing employee development
4) managerial training and development
5) performance management and appraisal
6) workforce retention, and
7) education upgrades.
Indian companies have become also innovative not only in how they recruit but also in whom they recruit and where they look for talent. Most of them have developed a recruitment philosophy to hire for overall skill and aptitude rather than specialized domain and technical skills.
Women and older workers in particular are being targeted by technology companies and call centers, which are also reaching out to rural and disadvantaged communities.
All the above let us conclude that Colombian companies have long played the gum, developing and disseminating many widely adopted management and workforce practices. The time has come for stop learning from the USA “guru” and start learning from one of its disciples: India.
Yet India is racing ahead to become a global center for advanced R&D in several industries. In trying to understand how India is achieving this feat, we know that the Indian private sector was found a way to overcome deficiencies in its education system through innovative programs of workforce training and development. These have transformed workers with a weak educational foundation into R&D specialists.
Indian native firms reveal that despite its low rates of postgraduate science and engineering graduation comparing to China, India is rapidly becoming a global hub for R&D, with a momentum and scale similar to those it accomplished in IT services.
But If engineering education is so critical to global competitiveness, how is India succeeding?
To answer this, we have to take into account the R&D leaders, managers, and employees, and see the R&D and training facilities the leading companies in India. These are in rapidly growing emerging sectors, including TT services, business-process outsourcing, semiconductors, Pharmaceuticals, financial services, retail, hospitality; and education—all of which have managed to grow and innovate despite skills gaps and talent shortages.
The Indian key of development: Discipline
During the 70s and 1980s, the Japanese achieved major advances in manufacturing management, which led them rise as an economic power by studying, adopting, and eventually perfecting the best practices of western companies. India is achieving similar feats in workforce development: India has learned and perfected the best practices of leading companies that have been outsourcing their computer systems and call centers.
They invest in their employees
In a fact which India’s largest competitor, China, has been quite criticized is investing in its employees. Indian industry has had to adapt and has built innovative and comprehensive approaches to workforce training and management. The initial focus was on training new recruits and filling entirely-level skill gaps. Now, these companies are investing in constantly improving the skills and management abilities of their workers and in providing incentives for them to stay and grow with the company.
There are seven key areas in which Indian companies have developed innovative practices:
1) employee recruitment
2) new employee training
3) continuing employee development
4) managerial training and development
5) performance management and appraisal
6) workforce retention, and
7) education upgrades.
Indian companies have become also innovative not only in how they recruit but also in whom they recruit and where they look for talent. Most of them have developed a recruitment philosophy to hire for overall skill and aptitude rather than specialized domain and technical skills.
Women and older workers in particular are being targeted by technology companies and call centers, which are also reaching out to rural and disadvantaged communities.
All the above let us conclude that Colombian companies have long played the gum, developing and disseminating many widely adopted management and workforce practices. The time has come for stop learning from the USA “guru” and start learning from one of its disciples: India.
Suscribirse a:
Entradas (Atom)